what does is mean, turn the other cheek, in regards to defending ones self

Phrase from the Sermon on the Mount in Christian doctrine

Turning the other cheek is a phrase in Christian doctrine from the Sermon on the Mount that refers to responding to injury without revenge and allowing more injury. This passage is variously interpreted every bit accepting one'south predicament, commanding nonresistance or advocating Christian pacifism.

Scriptural references [edit]

The phrase originates from the Sermon on the Mountain in the New Testament. In the Gospel of Matthew affiliate 5, an alternative for "an eye for an eye" is given by Jesus:

38You lot take heard that it was said, "An middle for an eye and a tooth for a tooth." 39Only I say to you, Practise not resist the one who is evil. But if anyone slaps y'all on the right cheek, plough to him the other also. 40And if anyone would sue you and take your tunic, let him have your cloak as well. 41And if anyone forces yous to go one mile, go with him ii miles. 42Give to the one who begs from you, and exercise not refuse the one who would borrow from yous.

Jesus Christ, English Standard Version (Matthew 5:38–42)

In the Sermon on the Apparently[1] in the Gospel of Luke chapter 6, every bit part of his command to "love your enemies", Jesus says:

27But I say to you who hear, Love your enemies, exercise practiced to those who detest you, 28bless those who curse you, pray for those who corruption you. 29To 1 who strikes you on the cheek, offering the other also, and from one who takes abroad your cloak practice non withhold your tunic either. xxxGive to everyone who begs from y'all, and from one who takes away your appurtenances do not demand them dorsum. 31And as you wish that others would practice to y'all, do so to them.

Jesus Christ, English language Standard Version (Luke half dozen:27–31)

Interpretations [edit]

This phrase, as with much of the Sermon on the Mount, has been subject to both literal and figurative interpretations.

Christian agitator estimation [edit]

According to this interpretation the passages call for total nonresistance to the point of facilitating aggression against oneself, and since homo governments defend themselves by military machine force, some have advocated Christian anarchism, including Leo Tolstoy who elucidated his reasoning in his 1894 volume The Kingdom of God Is Within You.

Irenic resistance interpretation [edit]

The scholar Walter Wink, in his volume Engaging the Powers: Discernment and Resistance in a Globe of Domination, interprets the passage equally ways to subvert the power structures of the time.[2]

At the time of Jesus, says Wink, striking backhand a person deemed to be of lower socioeconomic class was a ways of asserting authority and dominance. If the persecuted person "turned the other cheek," the discipliner was faced with a dilemma: The left hand was used for unclean purposes, so a back-manus strike on the reverse cheek would not be performed. An alternative would be a slap with the open hand equally a challenge or to punch the person, but this was seen as a statement of equality. Thus, by turning the other cheek, the persecuted was demanding equality.

Wink continues with an interpretation of handing over one's cloak in add-on to 1'due south tunic. The debtor has given the shirt off his back, a situation forbidden by Hebrew law as stated in Deuteronomy (24:10–thirteen). By giving the lender the cloak as well, the debtor was reduced to nakedness. Flash notes that public nudity was viewed equally bringing shame on the viewer, and not just the naked, as seen in Noah's instance (Genesis 9:20–23).

Wink interprets the succeeding verse from the Sermon on the Mountain equally a method for making the oppressor pause the law. The commonly invoked Roman police force of Angaria immune the Roman regime to need that inhabitants of occupied territories deport letters and equipment the altitude of ane mile mail service, but prohibited forcing an individual to go farther than a single mile, at the adventure of suffering disciplinary actions.[iii] In this example, the nonviolent interpretation sees Jesus as placing criticism on an unjust and hated Roman law, every bit well as clarifying the teaching to extend across Jewish law.[4]

See likewise [edit]

  • Brotherly love (philosophy)
  • Christian pacifism
  • Expounding of the Law#Retaliation
  • Alive by the sword, dice by the sword
  • Matthew 5:29, Matthew 10
  • Tolstoyan
  • Violence begets violence
  • Law of attraction (New Thought)
  • Simply war theory

References [edit]

  1. ^ Luke 6:17– – This is a different location than the sermon on the mount of Matthew.
  2. ^ Wink, Walter (1992). Engaging the Powers: Discernment and Resistance in a World of Domination. Fortress Press. pp. 175–82. ISBN978-0-80062646-4 . Retrieved December 27, 2013.
  3. ^ Th. Mommsen. Codex Theodosianus 8:5:1.
  4. ^ Avi-Yonah, Michael. The Jews Nether Roman and Byzantine Rule: A Political History of Palestine from the Bar Kokhba War to the Arab Conquest.

Further reading [edit]

  • Jim Douglass, Lightning from East to West: Jesus, Gandhi, and the nuclear historic period, 1983 ISBN 0-8245-0587-5

External links [edit]

  • Christian Nonviolence
  • The Limits of "Turn The Other Cheek"

sissonhaves1955.blogspot.com

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turning_the_other_cheek

0 Response to "what does is mean, turn the other cheek, in regards to defending ones self"

Enregistrer un commentaire

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel